Friday, November 26, 2010

Asian Games 2010 - Medal Tally




Asian Games 2010 Medal Tally


Ranking Country Gold Silver Bronze Total
1 China 185 106 92 383
2 Korea 72 61 87 220
3 Japan 42 70 88 200
4 Iran 19 11 24 54
5 Kazakhstan 16 20 34 70
6 Chinese Taipei 12 13 34 59
7 Uzbekistan 10 19 21 50
8 India 10 14 29 53
9 Malaysia 9 17 13 39
10 Thailand 9 7 31 47
11 Hong Kong, China 8 15 16 39
12 DPR Korea 6 10 18 34
13 Indonesia 4 9 12 25
14 Singapore 4 7 6 17
15 Athletes from Kuwait 4 6 1 11
16 Qatar 4 4 6 14
17 Philippines 3 3 9 15
18 Saudi Arabia 3 3 5 11
19 Pakistan 3 2 3 8
20 Bahrain 3 0 3 6
21 Jordan 2 2 1 5
22 Viet Nam 1 17 14 32
23 Mongolia 1 3 9 13
24 Kyrgyzstan 1 2 2 5
25 Macao, China 1 1 3 5
26 Tajikistan 1 0 3 4
27 Myanmar 0 5 3 8
28 United Arab Emirates 0 4 1 5
29 Iraq 0 1 2 3
Lebanon 0 1 2 3
31 Afghanistan 0 1 1 2
Bangladesh 0 1 1 2
33 Lao PDR 0 0 2 2
34 Nepal 0 0 1 1
Oman 0 0 1 1
Syria 0 0 1 1
Total 433 435 579 1447

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

EMI Calculator

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

US demands world response over Korea warship sinking

Washington:US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says the international community must respond in the growing crisis over the sinking of a South Korean warship.

She said there was "overwhelming" evidence that North Korea was to blame, and urged Pyongyang to halt its "policy of belligerence".

Mrs Clinton was speaking in South Korea at the end of an Asian tour.

North Korea denies it was responsible, and has warned of retaliation if action is taken against it.

After an international investigation produced proof that the ship, the Cheonan, was hit by a North Korean torpedo, South Korea announced a package of measures, including a halt to most trade. It is also seeking action via the United Nations Security Council.

The North then announced, late on Tuesday, that it was cutting all ties with the South. It has also banned South Korean ships and planes from its territory.

South Korean Foreign Minister Yu Myung-Hwan told a joint news conference he and Mrs Clinton had agreed that North Korea should take responsibility for the sinking of the Cheonan, torpedoed on 26 March with the

"This was an unacceptable provocation by North Korea and the international community has a responsibility and a duty to respond," Mrs Clinton said.

The incident required "a strong but measured response," she said.

Before going to Seoul, Mrs Clinton had two days of discussions in Beijing with her Chinese counterparts.

She has been pressing China to join the international condemnation but Beijing is taking a cautious line, calling for restraint.

"I believe that the Chinese understand the seriousness of this issue and are willing to listen to the concerns expressed by both South Korea and the United States," Mrs Clinton said on Wednesday.

"We expect to be working with China as we move forward in fashioning a response."

Chinese Vice-Foreign Minister Zhang Zhijun earlier said his country was still evaluating information on the sinking of the Cheonan.

"We have always believed that dialogue is better than confrontation," he added.

Tank exercises

With tensions rising rapidly, the North has reacted angrily to trade and shipping sanctions announced by the South.

It said on Wednesday it would cut off a road link across the heavily defended border if Seoul resumed propaganda broadcasts, halted six years ago.

Earlier, the North said it would match Southern sanctions with its own, and sever the few remaining lines of communication between the two governments.

South Korean ships and planes would be banned from Northern territorial waters and airspace.

All South Korean workers in the jointly run Kaesong industrial park north of the border were expected to be expelled although they were allowed to enter on Wednesday, Reuters news agency reports.

Apart from Kaesong, there is little economic relationship left between the two states, their ties almost frozen since Lee Myung-bak took office in 2008, the agency notes.

"North Korea is not closing up Kaesong immediately because it is saving the cards it needs in order to play the game," said Jang Cheol-hyeon, a researcher at the Institute for National Security Strategy.

The two states are technically still at war after the Korean conflict ended without a peace treaty in 1953.

South Korean K1 tanks could be seen on Tuesday conducting an exercise to prepare for a possible surprise attack by North Korea.

Monday, March 29, 2010

Australian Grand Prix 2010 Highlights Video

The second grand prix of the season takes the Formula 1 teams to Australia with Fernando Alonso leading the drivers championship.The most enduring feeling though after the Bahrain race that promised so much was how little it actually delivered in terms of racing excitement. The general consensus was that the much heralded rule change.


McLaren’s Jenson Button Wins the Australian Grand Prix



Janson Button has won the Australian Grand Prix in flying colours, While Kubica and Massa came 2nd and 34d respectively. Detailed results and Video Replay of the race will be available shortly.

Pos No Driver Constructor Laps Time/Retired Grid Points
1 1 Jenson Button McLaren-Mercedes 58 1:33:36.531 4 25
2 11 Robert Kubica Renault 58 +12.034 9 18
3 7 Felipe Massa Ferrari 58 +14.488 5 15
4 8 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 58 +16.304 3 12
5 4 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 58 +16.683 6 10
6 2 Lewis Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes 58 +29.989 11












Courtesy:http://www.totalsportsmadness.com/2010/03/26/australian-grand-prix-2010-live-stream-highlights/

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Google Pulled Out From China For Personal Reasons: Google Co-Founder

New York:A leading newspaper has stated that Google’s pull-out from China is partly motivated by its co-founder Sergey Brin’s own memories of oppression in the erstwhile Soviet Union.

Google suspended its China operations from March 22 after months of tussle with the Chinese government over cyber attacks.

Brin had emigrated to the USA from the former Soviet Union at the age of six in 1979. He said that the current Chinese web censorship and suppression of dissidents had reminded him of the ‘tyranny’ of his youth.

"In some aspects of their policy, particularly with respect to censorship, with respect to surveillance of dissidents, I see the same earmarks of totalitarianism, and I find that personally quite troubling," he said.

Brin is still taking responsibility for the day-to-day running of Google along with other co-founder Larry Page and CEO Eric Schmidt. He said that he couldn’t do more compromises for operating in China.

China exercised its grip over Google’s activity after the Summer Olympics of 2008.

"China was ever-present," he said.

"One out of five meetings that I attended, there was some component specifically applied to China in a different way than other countries," he added.

Google has re-routed its searches to a site in Hong Kong that is not censored. But, for the past few days, users are complaining of limitations to their searches.

At the same time, Brin has also sent a signal to other countries like Australia which plans to come up with a system that would filter out information judged objectionable to children.

"One of the reasons I am glad we are making this move in China is that the China situation was really emboldening other countries to try and implement their own firewalls," he said.


Thursday, March 25, 2010

Cricket Live: IPL 3 2010

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

China no threat to India's IT industry - just yet

NEW DELHI: One of the perpetual fears of the export-oriented Indian software industry is that one day it is going to be overtaken by China. Well, there is cause for cheer - at least for the moment - as a recent McKinsey study says that it will be quite a while before China can really threaten India in this sector.

"To compete with India, China will have to consolidate its highly fragmented industry to gain the size and expertise needed to capture large international projects. Currently, there is little movement in this direction," says the McKinsey study. It shows that only about 12% of Chinese software services companies see mergers, acquisitions (M&As)and alliances as important in their agenda.

"Managers in China have little M&A experience, while several Indian companies are considering acquisition of Chinese firms to expand their operations," the study says. "No company has emerged from this crowded pack. Only five have more than 2,000 employees. India, on the other hand, has a little less than 3,000 software services companies. Of these, at least 15 have more than 2,000 workers and some, including Infosys Technologies, Tata Consultancy Services and Wipro Technologies, have garnered international recognition and a global clientele," says the study.

Only six of China's 30 biggest software companies are qualified at level five or four of the capability-maturity model. On the other hand, all of the top 30 Indian software companies have surpassed these benchmarks. While China has about 8,000 software services providers, close to 75% of them have fewer than 50 employees. Without adequate scale, Chinese players are unlikely to attract top international clients. "Chinese software services providers do little to develop their employees and very few use stock options, training programs or other incentives to build talent," McKinsey notes.

The top 10 Chinese information technology (IT) services companies have only about 20% share of the market compared with 45% garnered by India's top 10. "Shortcomings in the structure of China's IT industry prevent it from taking full advantage of an increasing English-speaking graduate force. Although revenues from IT services are on the rise, they are barely half of India's $12.7 billion a year. Growth is driven by domestic demand - most customers are small and mid-size Chinese enterprises who want their software customized to their own needs," says the report.

According to it, Japanese customers, who seek mostly low-value application-development contracts rather than more lucrative ones for design, supply about 65% of the income. Despite lower costs, operating margins in Chinese software services companies average only 7% compared with 11% at similar companies around the world because many projects are below optimal scale and suppliers often compete on price.

Optimism belied

In the past, studies conducted by McKinsey as well as NASSCOM (National Association of Software and Service Companies, a body that represents the Indian software industry) have warned that China could pose a major threat to the Indian IT industry. In 2002, while McKinsey sounded an optimistic note about India's IT sector, it cautioned that if India did not promote itself aggressively, China, the Philippines and Singapore could walk off with most of the business from global majors. McKinsey was especially concerned about China, despite the fact that the top 10 Indian companies exported more software than Russia and China put together. "The country has recognized the opportunity and both the government and the industry are making a concerted effort to give a fillip to the IT space," McKinsey had said.

Another study by the global consulting major had even said that India would be left behind by a Chinese government and industry program that is channeling billions of dollars to nine Chinese universities, shaping tie-ups with colleges abroad and investing millions of dollars in research laboratories and equipment. With more than 100,000 Indians migrating to the United States each year for better-paid software jobs, Indian industry has already started hiring from China to meet the shortfall, the study said.

"Many Indian companies have already started recruiting from Chinese universities. China has a systematic program of funding universities." The studies by McKinsey and NASSCOM showed that Indian technical institutes would be unable to meet the projected demand of 500,000 professionals in 2006. Experts warned that the only stumbling block preventing China from overtaking India, given its cost advantage and large trained manpower, was the language barrier, which could be surmounted.

The future

Clearly, in the continually changing business paradigm, it is never easy to predict definitively how a particular sector is going to shape up. The latest McKinsey study comes in response to intense speculation that China, inundating the world with cheap manufacturing goods, will beat India in the software sector as well. But while technical expertise and manpower are one aspect of a booming IT industry, fresh management practices, economies of scale, mergers and acquisitions, access to finance, client interface and relationships are equally important in the longer run.

The rules of the game are changing by the year. As Indian IT firms reach global scales, there is talk of reverse outsourcing - engineers from the West finding employment in overseas operations of Indian firms. This, in addition to the many out-of-work executives from the US who have shifted base to India in search of better opportunities. Faced with rising business from the West, spiraling salaries of high-cost employees who constantly hop jobs as well as a predicted shortage of skilled workers, Indian IT firms are doing the next best thing - outsourcing work from the US to China, with the added advantage of leveraging more intra-Asian business from Korea, Japan, Hong Kong and Taiwan.

According to research firm Gartner Group, the global IT services market is worth $580 billion, of which only $19 billion is outsourced, but India commands 80% of this offshore market. The figure for outsourced IT services is expected to grow very rapidly. The IT services market is broadly divided into two sections - IT/tech services that require skilled manpower, which China possesses, and the business and process outsourcing (BPO) segment which requires a knowledge of English and thus cannot be further outsourced to China. India garners the bulk of the outsourced BPO business as well, which makes its position in the international IT industry rock solid, for now at least.

Priyanka Bhardwaj is a New Delhi-based writer
Asia Times

Friday, February 5, 2010

US defends $6.4bn weapons sale to Taiwan

Washington: The US has defended a proposed weapons sale to Taiwan following a furious response from China.The US State Department said on Saturday that the sale contributed to "security and stability" between Taiwan and China, Reuters reported.Beijing announced a series of moves against the US in retaliation for the proposed $6.4bn (£4bn) sale.Ties between the two countries are already strained by rows over trade and internet censorship.

"Such sales contribute to maintaining security and stability across the Taiwan Strait," said US State Department spokeswoman Laura Tischler, quoted by Reuters.
The US is the leading arms supplier to Taiwan and has a treaty obligation to provide it with defensive arms.

Severe harm:Beijing said it would suspend military exchanges with the US, review co-operation on major issues and impose sanctions on companies selling arms.However, the US - like the EU - has banned its companies selling arms to China since the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, so it was not clear what effect Chinese sanctions would have.Chinese defence ministry spokesman Huang Xueping said the measures reflected the "severe harm" posed by the deal.A foreign ministry spokesman said the arms deal would have "repercussions that neither side wishes to see".

Difficult ties:Taiwan and China have been ruled by separate governments since the end of a civil war in 1949.Beijing has hundreds of missiles pointed at the island and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control if Taiwan moved towards formal independence.Defence ties between Washington and Beijing have been on ice for several years because of differences over Taiwan, though the two countries' leaders pledged to improve them in 2009.

Taiwan, meanwhile, welcomed the US move."It will let Taiwan feel more confident and secure so we can have more interactions with China," the Central News Agency quoted President Ma Ying-jeou as saying.The Pentagon earlier notified the US Congress of the proposed arms sale, which forms part of a package first pledged by the Bush administration.Friday's notification to Congress by the Defense Security Co-operation Agency (DSCA) was required by law. It does not mean the sale has been concluded.US lawmakers have 30 days to comment on the proposed sale, Associated Press reported. If there are no objections, it would proceed.

The arms package includes 114 Patriot missiles, 60 Black Hawk helicopters and communications equipment for Taiwan's F-16 fleet, the agency said in a statement.
It does not include F-16 fighter jets, which Taiwan's military has been seeking.
Last week US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton angered Beijing with a call to China to investigate cyber attacks on search giant Google, after the company said email accounts of human rights activists had been hacked.